ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္း​စုၾကည္နဲ႔ ဂ်ာမန္၀န္ႀ​ကီး သတင္းစာရွင္း​လင္းပြဲ

Wednesday, February 15, 2012


ေဖေဖာ္၀ါရီ ၁၄ ရက္ေန႔ အဂၤါေန႔က ရန္ကုန္ျမိဳ႕မွာ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္း​စုၾကည္နဲ႔ ဂ်ာမန္၀န္ႀ​ကီး ေတြ႕ဆုံအၿပီး ျပဳလုပ္တ့ဲ သတင္းစာရွင္း​လင္းပြဲ အသံ​ဖုိင္ ျဖ​စ္ပါတယ္။

ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္က ေတြ႔ဆုံမႈနဲ႔ ပတ္သက္ျပီး စတင္ ေျပာဆုိပါတယ္။
အဲဒီေနာက္ ဂ်ာမန္၀န္ႀ​ကီးကလည္း ေဆြးေနြးပဲြအေၾကာင္း အက်ဥ္းခ်ဳံး ေျပာဆုိပါတယ္။ အဂၤလိပ္ဘာသာနဲ႔ပါပဲ။ တေယာက္ကုိ တမိနစ္ေလာက္ ေျပာၾကပါတယ္။
သတင္းေထာက္ေတြရဲ႕ အေမးေတြကုိ သူတုိ႔ ၂ ေယာက္ ေျဖဆုိၾကပါတယ္။

အသံဖုိင္ကုိ ေဒါင္းလုတ္ လုပ္နုိင္ပါျပီ။

ဒီမွာ နားေထာင္ဖုိ႔ အခက္အခဲ ရိွရင္ မူရင္း အသံဖုိင္စာမ်က္နွာ http://soundcloud.com/sithublogger/daw-suu-and-german-federal-1 မွာ နားေထာင္နုိင္ပါတယ္။

ဂ်ာမန္၀န္ႀကီးက စီးပြားေရး ပူးေပါင္းေဆာင္ရြက္မႈႏွင့္ ဖြံ႕ၿဖိဳးတိုးတက္မႈ ဝန္ႀကီး Mr. Dirk Niebel ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။
Posted in: , ,



10 comments :

  1. Anonymous said... :
    February 15, 2012 at 3:47 AM

    ျပည္ပ ေခါင္းေဆာင္ေတြက၊ Myanmar လို ့ ေခၚေနၾကၿပီး၊ ေဒၚစုက Burma လို ့ပဲ ေခၚေနေသးတာ နည္းနည္း ထူးျခားေနေသးသလိုပဲ။ Myanmar လို ့ ေဒၚစုကို ေခၚေစခ်င္တဲ့ သေဘာမ်ိဳး ေျပာတာမဟုတ္ပါဘူး။ ျပည္သူလူထုက ေရြးခ်ယ္တင္ေျမွာက္ၿပီး တက္လာတဲ့ အစိုးရက ေျပာင္းထားတဲ့ နာမည္မဟုတ္လို ့၊ မေခၚခ်င္တာေတာ့ သိပါတယ္။ တုိင္းျပည္ရဲ့ အေရးပါအရာေရာက္ဆံုး အစိုးရအဖြဲ ့အတြက္၊ အမတ္ေလာင္းအျဖစ္ အေရြးခံေတာ့မယ့္ ေဒၚစုကို၊ အေသးအဖြဲ ကိစၥေလးတခုေၾကာင့္ အစိုးရက ၿငိဳျငင္သြားမွာကို စိုးရိမ္မိလို ့ပါ။

  1. Peter Shwe said... :
    February 15, 2012 at 12:37 PM

    မွန္ပါသည္။ နိုင္ငံေတာ္၇ဲ. နာမည္ကို ေရြးခ်ယ္တဲ.ေန၇ာမွာ၊ လူထု၏ သေဘာတူညီခ်က္မပါပဲ၊ ေရြးခ်ယ္ထာတဲ.နာမယ္ကိုပဲေခၚမလား အမ်ားနာလည္ေနတဲ. တိုင္ျပည္နာမယ္ကို ေခၚပါမလား ဆိုတာ ဒီေန၇ာမွာ conflict ျဖစ္နိုင္ပါတယ္။ ဒါေပမဲ. လူထုတ၇ပ္လံုး အေသအျခာ စဥ္စားၾကည္.မယ္ဆို၇င္၊ နိုင္ငံ၇ဲ. နာမယ္ကလဲ ျမန္မာ၊ လူမ်ိဳးကလည္းျမန္မာ လို. အဂႍလိပ္လို form ေတြျဖည္.ေနၾက၇တဲ. ့ျပည္ပဆိုင္၇ာ ျမန္မာေတြၾကေတာ. လူ၇ီစ၇ာၾကီးပါ။ Nationality ေမးေတာ. Myanmar လို.ျဖည္.ၾက၇သလို၊ Country of origin က်ေတာ.လည္း Myanmar. Nationality မွာ ဘာေၾကာင္. Myanmese လို. မေျပာၾကတာလဲ ဆိုတာေတာ. ေမးစ၇ာ မျဖစ္ေပဘူးလား။ Burma လို.နာမည္တြင္ခဲ.တံုးက၊ Burmese လို. မျဖည္.ခဲ.ၾက၇ဘူးလား။ ေျဖ.ခဲ.ၾက၇တာပဲ မဟုတ္လား။ ကမၻာက သိတဲ.နိုင္ငံသည္ Burma ပါ။ ျမန္မာလူမ်ဳးေတြကိုလည္း Burmese လို.ပဲ လက္ခံထားၾကတယ္။ ဒီလိုပါပဲ၊ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ အေနနဲ.ကလည္း Media ေတြကိုေျပာတဲ.ေန၇ာမွာ ကမၻာက သိတဲ language ကိုပဲသံုးျပီး ေျပာေနတာ၇ယ္၊ ဖခင္ၾကီး၇ဲ. သတ္မွတ္ထားခဲ.တဲ. တိုင္းျပည္၇ဲ.အသိအမွတ္ျပဳ နိုင္ငံတခုအျဖစ္ထားရွိျပီး ေခၚဆိုေနတာ ျဖစ္နိုင္ေကာင္းတယ္လို. ၾကားကေန တင္ျပပါတယ္။
    အမွန္ေတာ. လူထု၇ဲ. သေဘာေလးေတာ. ယူၾက၇င္ေကာင္းတာေပါ. တိုင္းျပည္ကို နာမယ္ေျပာင္းတဲ.ကိစၥဟာ a big job ပါ။ ပီကင္းက နာမယ္ပ်က္စျပဳလာေတာ. ေဘဂ်င္ေျပာင္းသလို၊ ဘံုေဘက မိုဘိုင္းလို.ေျပာင္းသလို၊ ဗမာျပည္ကလည္း ျမန္မာျပည္လို. ေျပာင္းတာ သိပ္မဆန္းသလိုျဖစ္ေပမဲ. Myanmar ကို မိုင္၇င္ မာ လို. တခ်ိဳ. နိုင္ငံျခားသားေတြက မပီလို. ေခၚေနသံေတာ.ၾကာ:ေနေလ၇ဲ.။ နဲနဲေတာ. ရွက္မိတယ္။ Burma ကို ဘယ္သူမွ ဘူးမားလို.မေခၚခဲ.ၾကပါ။ အိႏၵယ လူမ်ိဳးမ်ားကသာ စကားမပီလို. ဘာ၇မာ လို.ေခၚသံၾကားဖူးတယ္။ ဗမာျပည္လို. ျပန္ေျပာင္းနိုင္၇င္ Myanmar ကေန Burma သို.ေျပာင္းမဲ.အခ်ိန္ကိုေစာင္.၇င္း အမွန္တ၇ားကေလးတခု ဗဟုသုတ အျဖစ္ တိုက္တိုက္ ဆိုင္ဆိုင္မို.တင္ျပလိုက္ပါတယ္။

  1. Anonymous said... :
    February 15, 2012 at 9:41 PM

    Daw su is from england that's why she call Burma instead of Myanmar. When she become MP, she may change our country name to Burgland :-). I feel so sorry about our people that thae have blind faith on Daw Su. Actually she did nothing, But she spend several years under house arrest as investment for success in her career. Now she is claiming her success and she get blind faith from Myanmar people , especially poorly educated people. I am really sick of her. I knew that there are a lot of people who don't like her. But if we oppose her people will assume us as bad guys and supporters of military regime. So we have no choice, only to keep silence. IT IS HARD FOR ME TO ACCEPT THIS SITUATION AS POSITIVE.

  1. Anonymous said... :
    February 15, 2012 at 10:21 PM

    ေက်းဇူးပါပဲ ကိုပီတာ။ ဒီလိုေႏြးေထြးတဲ့
    တုန္ ့ျပန္ေဆြးေႏြးခ်က္ေလးကို ဖတ္ရတာ၊ ရင္ထဲမွာ ၾကည္ႏူးမိပါတယ္။ အရင္အစိုးရလက္ထက္တုန္းက ျပည္ပေခါင္းေဆာင္တခ်ိဳ ့ Burma လို ့ပဲ ဆက္ေခၚေန
    လို ့၊ ကေတာက္ကဆေတြ ျဖစ္ၾကေသးတာ ဖတ္လိုက္ ၾကားလိုက္ရေသးတယ္။ ျမန္မာျပည္၀င္ခြင့္ေတာင္းတဲ့
    အခ်ိန္မွာ၊ ခင္ဗ်ားတို ့ Myanmar လို ့ေျပာင္းမေခၚရင္၊ ျပည္၀င္ခြင့္မေပးဘူးလို ့ ကန္ ့သတ္ထားလို ့မ်ား မေခၚမျဖစ္ ေခၚေနၾကရတာလားေတာ့ မသိဘူးေနာ္။ ဒါေပမယ့္ က်ေနာ္ၾကည့္ရတာ၊ သူတုိ ့ေတြလည္း အခက္အခဲမရွိ သက္ေတာင့္သက္သာပဲ ေခၚေနၾကတယ္။ ဒီ၀က္ဘ္ဆိုဒ္မွာပဲ ဒီအေခၚအေ၀ၚ
    နဲ ့ပါက္သက္ၿပီး (ျမန္မာလား၊ ဘားမားလား ဆိုတဲ့ ေဆာင္းပါးမွာလား မမွတ္မိေတာ့ဘူး) က်ေနာ္ Research လုပ္ၿပီး တင္ထားေပးဖူးတာ ရွိတယ္။ ျမန္မာဘုရင္လက္ထက္တုန္းက နန္းတြင္းမွာ ေနထိုင္ခြင့္ရခဲ့တဲ့၊ ဆာ အာသာဖယ္ယာေရး ျမန္မာျပည္အေၾကာင္းစာအုပ္ထဲမွာ၊ ျမန္မာလို ့ေခၚမွ အားလံုးကို ျခံဳၿပီးေခၚရာက်တယ္ ဆုိတာမ်ိဳးပါ။ ဒါေပမယ့္ သူကိုယ္တုိင္ပဲ ျပန္ရွင္းထားတာက၊ ျမန္မာလို ့ ေရးေပမယ့္ ဗမာလို ့ အသံထြက္ရတယ္တဲ့။ ဆုိေတာ့ Myanmar လို ့ေရးထားတာကို Bamar/Burma လို ့ ထြက္ၾကပါလို ့ ေျပာရမလား၊ အသံထြက္အတုိင္း Bamar/Burma လို ့ပဲေရးၿပီး၊ ေရးတဲ့ အတုိင္းပဲ ထြက္ခိုင္းရမလားဆုိတာပဲ စဥ္းစားစရာ။ ဒါကလည္း ဒီစာအုပ္ရဲ့ အာေဘာ္ကို အတည္ျပဳမွ ရမွာပါ။ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္အေနနဲ ့လည္း ဒီအစိုးရ
    နဲ ့သင့္တင့္ေအာင္၊ လိုက္ေလ်ာညီေထြမွုရွိေအာင္ အမ်ားၾကီးလုပ္ခဲ့ၿပီးၿပီျဖစ္ေပမယ့္၊ ဒီတခုကိုေတာ့ တင္းခံထားတုန္းပဲျဖစ္ေနတာကို စဥ္းစားၿပီး၊ က်ေနာ္ပထမဆံုး ေကာ့မန္ ့ ေရးတင္ခဲ့တာပါ။ စာဖတ္သူေတြရဲ့ အျမင္ေလးေတြ ထပ္တက္လာတာကို၊ ျမင္ခ်င္ပါေသးတယ္။ အျမင္ေလးေတြ ဖလွယ္ၾကရင္းနဲ ့၊ က်ေနာ္တုိ ့ရဲ့ ရင္းႏွီးမွုေလးေတြ တည္ေဆာက္ၾကတာ
    ေပါ့ဗ်ာ။

  1. Peter Shwe said... :
    February 15, 2012 at 11:52 PM

    Yes I can understand your concerns. I also accept that it is hard for you to accept. she was from England but born in Burma. I can assure that she will not manipulate our people. She had a very strong feeling. Her father was assassinated if you remember. She will not let down our citizens. She scarified years living in house arrest. Why is that? Who is going to be away from the family and sacrified for nothing? I can understand the feelings people had as you mentioned in your comment. I know some people like her and some people don't. It is depending upon how people's concept. Everbody has their rights to say anything they want. I am not from Daw Su Kyi's side as well as the other side ( military regime ). However I am trying to balance up both sides and their course actions for the public. Our people were getting poor an poor. The inflation has gone up like a fly sky. who takes the responsibility to recover from this? I see nobody. All they were doing is making their pockets full. Selling the country to China. Daw Su has no chance to do yet. She brings business and foreign investments. You would appreciate the top people from individual countries are still arriving our country to say hello to Daw Su. And yet they are contributing their investments in our country for the development. China is sucking our blood. Not giving out gold or the country's developments as far as I am aware of. This is only example. Because Burma was sactioned by the world only china can be approachable by our military. So we were not improving as much as we would. The country is getting poor an poor.
    So I am trying to balance up between military government and Daw Su. She is a member of the public. She will think twice to do something which would give hum to our citizens. She will not do anything to hum us. She deserves something and some positiion in the country. That 's all I like to comment.

  1. To Anonymous said... :
    February 16, 2012 at 12:39 AM

    To the person who spouted this...
    =================================
    Anonymous says: February 15, 2012 9:41 PM Reply
    Daw su is from england that's why she call Burma instead of Myanmar. When she become MP, she may change our country name to Burgland :-). I feel so sorry about our people that thae have blind faith on Daw Su. Actually she did nothing, But she spend several years under house arrest as investment for success in her career. Now she is claiming her success and she get blind faith from Myanmar people , especially poorly educated people. I am really sick of her. I knew that there are a lot of people who don't like her. But if we oppose her people will assume us as bad guys and supporters of military regime. So we have no choice, only to keep silence. IT IS HARD FOR ME TO ACCEPT THIS SITUATION AS POSITIVE.
    =================================

    You are really mistaken about the intelligence of Burmese people and for that matter, the leaders from all over the world. How could you in any sensible mind say that solitary house arrest was an investment for personal success? Maybe why don’t you try shutting out yourself from outside world for a week, not even a month, just to emulate what a person under house arrest feels? Really, it amazes me every time people like you declaim and attack personally on Daw ASSK just because she is loved and respected by all the Burmese and beyond.

    When did she ever claim success for what is going on in Burma right now? Is she really loved by only the poorly educated? Maybe, the government leaders from around the world who have affectionately paid a visit to her are not as educated and intelligent as you are indeed? So are the president and the thugs-turned-politicians in current parliament who have accorded her a rightful respect! And if you seriously think the current situation is a success for Burma and Daw ASSK, you have really underestimated and naively assumed the whole situation of the sorry state of Burma and its people.

    Your whole message smacks of jealousy typical of those junta cronies and low-class soldiers sent to Russia who are wasting the tax-payers’ money but behaving as ingrates and insult to the people of Burma. Of course, you will be sick of her. And of course you know a lot of people who don’t like her. I believe in that assertion. In fact people like you will be sick of her and afraid of her because the new democratic Burma will not let you ravage the country and, enslave and abuse the Burmese people. I believe you must have the blind faith to keep the status quo of the military-controlled Burma in which you can abuse and pillage the country without any consequences and accountability.

    You are also right that the situation currently is not positive yet. How can the ordinary Burmese feel positive when the military reserves 25% in the parliament, the commander-in-chief is more powerful than the president himself, the thugs in green uniform with no college degrees take every civilian expertise positions within civil service, the army can defy the order of the president to stop fighting, and so on? The list continues ad infinitum, obviously. So, in light of these, Daw ASSK and the democracy activists are the only people who everyone can wholeheartedly trust and who will always stand in front of the people. This is just a beginning for the people of Burma heralding in a new era. There is obviously a long way to go. And understandably, you and your ilk will be very afraid of the change that is blowing in the air. Maybe you just continue reading the news but stop looking at those pictures with crowds.

    No wonder it takes a great deal more than having a brain to be the beloved leader of a country.

  1. Peter Shwe said... :
    February 16, 2012 at 3:25 AM

    ဟုတ္ပါတယ္။ အျမင္ကေလးေတြဖလွယ္္ၾကတာေပါ. ပထမဆံုး comment ေပးတဲ.ေနာင္ၾကီးေ၇။ က်ေနာ္ကေတာ. ဘယ္သူ.ဖက္ကမွ မဟုတ္ေပမဲ. ့ျပည္သူေတြအတြက္ ေကာင္းမဲ.အ၇ာေလးေတြ ရွာေဖြေလ.လာတင္ျပ၇င္း၊အေကာင္းျမင္ဝါဒ ကို တတ္နိုင္သေလာက္ၾကိဳးစားျပီး တင္ျပခဲ.တာပါ။ တေယာက္နဲ. တေယာက္ တခါတေလက်ေတာ.လည္း အယူအဆ တူခ်င္မွ တူတတ္ၾကပါတယ္။ ေစာေစာကပဲ က်ေနာ္ ဆီကို comment ေပးထားတာကို ေဒၚစုကို သေဘာမက်ျဖစ္တဲ. တေယာက္ကို က်ေနာ္ အဂႍလိပ္လိုပဲ ျပန္ရွင္းေပးထားပါတယ္။ လူတိုင္းမွာ မိမိတို.၇ဲ. ထင္ျမင္ခ်က္ကို ေျပာပိုင္ခြင္.ရွိၾကပါတယ္။ ေနာင္ၾကီးေျပာသလို ဘာေၾကာင္.တင္းခံေနျပီး Burma လို.ေျပာတာလည္းဆိုတာကို ေနာက္ထပ္က်ေနာ္ ့ျမင္တာကေတာ. နိုင္ငံျခားသားေတြက Burma လို.ေျပာေန၇င္ေတာ.၊ ျမန္မာလို.ေျပာမွာမဟုတ္ပါ။ က်ေနာ္တို.အတြက္ကေတာ. ဒါပါပဲ။ ဘာမွေတာ.မထူေလာက္ပါဘူး။ အေ၇းၾကီးတာကေတာ. တ၇ားေသာ ၾကားျဖတ္ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲျဖစ္ဖို.ပါပဲ။ ဒါကိုပဲ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္က သူတို.ကိုေျပာေနတာကေတာ. ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲျပီးေအာင္ေစာင္.ၾကပါဦး၊ ဆက္ရွင္ေတြကို မသိမ္းၾကပါနဲ.ဦးလို.မွာထားတာပဲ ဖတ္ၾကည္.နိုင္ပါတယ္။ သူ.အေၾကာင္းနဲ.သူေတာ.ရွိမွာေပါ.ေလ။ တခ်ိဳ.ကေတာ. ေဒၚစု လုပ္တာ အလုပ္မဟုတ္ဖူးလို. ေဝဖန္ၾကတယ္။ ေလာကမွာ အမဲရွိမွ၊ အျဖဴဆိုတာေပၚလြင္တာပါ။ ေဝဖန္တဲသူေတြရွိသလို၊ ေက်းဇူးတင္တဲ.သူေတြလည္းရွိေနမွာပါ။ ဂဏနး္ နံပါတ္ ၁ ကို ေလးဖက္ေလးတန္ကၾကည္.ျပီး တစ္လို.ေျပာတဲ.သူရွိသလို၊ ဂငယ္လို.ေျပာတဲ.သူလည္းရွိမွာပါ။ ထိုနည္းပဲ "င" လို.ေျပာတဲစူရွိသလို၊ "ပေဆာက္" လို.ေျပာတဲ.သူလည္းေတြ.၇မွာပါ။ အားလံုးက ကိုယ္ျမင္၇ာကို ေျပာျပီးျငင္းေနၾကမယ္ဆို၇င္၊ အေျဖမွန္၇ဖို. ခက္န္ုင္ပါတယ္ဗ်ာ။

  1. Anonymous said... :
    February 16, 2012 at 4:57 AM

    ဟား ဟား ဟား၊ ကိုပီတာၾကီးလည္း ျမန္မာလိုရွင္းလိုက္၊ အဂၤလိပ္လိုေရးလိုက္နဲ ့ တေယာက္တည္း ဒိုင္ခံၿပီး အလုပ္ရွုပ္ေနၿပီ။ ကိုပီတာက အဂၤလိပ္လိုေရးၿပီး ဟို Anonymous စာခ်စ္သူတေယာက္ရဲ့ ေကာ့မန္ ့ကို ျပန္ေခ်ပထားတာ က်ိဳးေၾကာင္းဆီေလ်ာ္ပါတယ္။ သူလည္း သူ ့အျမင္ကို တင္ျပတာကို၊ က်ေနာ္တုိ ့က ေလးစားရမွာေပါ့။ အဲဒီအထဲမွာ စာလံုးေပါင္းအမွားေတြ
    ေတြ ့ရေပမယ့္၊ ဒုတိယဘာသာစကားအေနနဲ ့ ေရးထားတာျဖစ္လို ့၊ နားလည္ေပးလို ့ ရပါတယ္။ ကိုပီတာ ေရးခ်င္တာက Harm ျဖစ္ဖို ့မ်ားပါတယ္၊ Hum ဆုိရင္၊ အဓိပၸါယ္ လံုးလံုးၾကီး ေျပာင္းသြားႏုိင္ပါတယ္။ Sacrifice ဆိုတာလည္း မွားေလ့ မွားထရွိတဲ့၊ စကားလံုး
    မ်ိဳးပါ။ Spelling check ရွိရင္ သိပ္ေကာင္းပါတယ္။ အမွားနည္းတာေပါ့။ ခၽြင္းခ်က္ကေတာ့ Harm ကို Hum လို ့ရိုက္ရင္၊ စာလံုးေပါင္းမမွားလို ့ အမွားျပမွာ မဟုတ္ပါဘူး။

  1. Peter Shwe said... :
    February 16, 2012 at 1:25 PM

    Please accept my humble apology for spelling errors it may cause inconvenience to the readers. I would be very grateful to the blog provider if there is a spell -check facility.
    Once again, sorry.

    And also thank you for being kind to me with this feedback of spelling errors in my comment that was made on 15/2/12. Many thanks indeed.

  1. Accountant General said... :
    February 16, 2012 at 4:26 PM

    One thing for sure is even though everyone use as Myanmar (as country and nationality),The name of Burma and Burmese were well written in the history and no way to erase them.

    Honestly speaking, it's doesn't matter Burma or Myanmar to me and most important one is communicate well and understand well each other to get the job done well.

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
 
Copyright © 2014 Irrawaddy Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved