8 comments :
-
My anonymous friend, you did a great job. I believe she intended to make the reporters clearly understand her. Plus, she speaks American English that simple most of the time. You only need some minor corrections.
I made it clear that he and those who support that vision - which he laid out for me, both inside and outside of government - will have our support as they continue to make progress, and that the United States is willing to match actions with actions. So, we're not at the point yet that we can consider lifting sanctions that we have in place because of our ongoing concerns about policies that have to be reversed but any steps that the government takes will be carefully considered and will be - as I said - matched because we want to see political and econmic reform take hold. And I told the leadership that we will certainly consider the easing and elimination of sanctions as we go forward in this process together. We welcome positive, constructive relations between China and her neighbors. We think that in China's interest as well as the neighborhood's interest.--------------------------
Thank you.
-
I'm really appreciate second anonymous's comment.I'm the first anonymous one.thanks.
-
Thanks both of anonymous.You did great job.Yeap by this way we have to learn english to stand shoulder to shoulder with the rest of the world.
-
To the second poster, American English is NOT simpler,inferior or wrong in any way. (This is what MANY Burmese mistakenly believe.)In fact, even British native English speakers are now using Americanisms, American usage and American pronunciations of some words due to the political, economic and social powers of the US.
To the first poster, the following is what I THINK she said, and I put the words you PROBABLY misheard in parentheses. I hope this helps.
(I)made it clear... that he and those who supports that vision which (he laid out for me).. both inside and outside of government will have our (support) as they (continue) to make progress and that united states (is) willing to matches action with action. (So) we're not at the point yet that we can consider lifting sanctions that we have in place because of our ongoing concerns about policies that have to be reversed. But any steps that the government takes will be carefully considered and will be as I said matched because we want to see political and economic reform take (hold).and I told (the) leadership that we will certainly consider the easing and the elmination of (sanctions) as we go forward in this process together. We welcome positive constructive relations between China and her neighbors. We think (that’s = that is) in China's interest as well as in the neighborhood's interest.
-
It is believed that the first five comments were made anonymously by four contributors. So I am the fifth anonymous if there would be non in between. Out of us five, the fourth anonymous was an IDIOT as he seemed to be hypocritical in his words.
Don't fume over it since I am an IDIOT too for making such a wasteful nonsense.
-
This is not my concern. But I notice someone calling someone else an idiot and themselves stupid. ( I think they were directing their comment at the one who talked about American English, which I personally think was a little pretentious.) Everyone had been civil until that comment showed up. I didn't see any hypocrisy in anyone's comment. Hypocrisy is when you don't practice what you preach. So the comment was totally irrelevant. What's more, attacking someone personally for their belief or claim negates any valid argument you may have had. If you want to prove someone wrong, then go ahead. If this is how OUR educated people argue, then we will certainly need a lot of luck in developing our country. By the way, nonsense is an uncountable noun and you can't use it with an indefinite article. And 'making a wasteful nonsense' does not make sense. Still, not knowing it makes you a stupid person; it is how you label other people without rhyme or reason that makes you one.
-
က်ေနာ္က ဒုတိယ ေကာ့မန္ ့ကိုေရးသူပါ။ အဂၤလိပ္လိုပဲ ျပန္ရွင္းေနရင္၊ ကိုယ့္ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံသားအခ်င္းခ်င္း၊ မလိုအပ္ပဲ နားလည္မွုေတြ လြဲၿပီးရင္းလြဲ
ျဖစ္ေနမွာစိုးလို ့ ျမန္မာလိုပဲ ေရးလိုက္ပါတယ္။ အစမွာေတာ့ ပထမ ေကာ့မန္ ့ေရးသူက သူ ့ရဲ့ အဂၤလိပ္စာ အၾကားစြမ္းရည္ကို၊ လိုလိုလားလားပဲ အျခားသူေတြကို အကူအညီေတာင္းလာလို ့၊ က်ေနာ္ျပန္ျပင္ေပးခဲ့တာကို သူက ၀မ္းသာစြာ လက္ခံယူခဲ့လို ့ ၀မ္းသာေနခဲ့ပါတယ္။ ပဥၥမ ေကာ့မန္ ့ကို ဖတ္ရေတာ့၊ က်ေနာ့္အေပ်ာ္ေတြ ပ်က္စီးကုန္သလို ခံစားခဲ့ရပါတယ္။ အေမရိကန္ အဂၤလိပ္စာကို ႏွိမ့္ခ်ေျပာဆိုခဲ့တဲ့ စကားတလံုးမွ၊ က်ေနာ္ မထည့္ခဲ့မိပါဘူး။ ဘာျဖစ္လို ့သူက အဓိပၸါယ္ေကာက္လြဲခဲ့ရသလဲဆိုတာ၊ သူၾကားတဲ့အတုိင္း ျပန္တင္ထားတာကို ဖတ္ရမွ သိရပါတယ္။ နကိုယ္က ရွင္းလင္းၿပီးသားျဖစ္တဲ့ အေမရိကန္ အဂၤလိပ္စာကို၊ ကလင္တန္က အၿမဲပဲ ပိုရွင္းေအာင္ ေျပာေလ့ရွိတယ္လို ့ပဲ က်ေနာ္ေျပာခဲ့တာပါ။ ေနာက္ၿပီး ျမန္မာလူမ်ိဳးေတြ အားလံုးနီးပါး အဲသည္လိုပဲ မွားမွားယြင္းယြင္း ထင္ၾကတယ္လို ့၊ သူက သိမ္းက်ံဳးၿပီးေျပာျပန္ေတာ့ က်ေနာ့္ဘက္က တခုခု ျပန္ေျပာမွ ျဖစ္ေတာ့မယ္
လို ့ယူဆလို ့ ျပန္ေရးရျခငး္ ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။
သူ ့ရဲ့ယူဆခ်က္အျမင္ေတြကိုေတာ့ ဒီမိုကေရစီသေဘာတရားအရ၊ ကန္ ့ကြက္စရာ မရိွပါဘူး။ ဒါေပမယ့္ အဲသည္ ယူဆခ်က္ေတြကို အဂၤလိပ္လိုျပန္ေရးထားတာ မွားေနလို ့ေတာ့၊ အမွန္ကို ေထာက္ျပေပးပါရေစ။
American English is NOT simpler,inferior or wrong in any way. နာမ၀ိေသသနေတြ ဆင့္ေရးေတာ့မယ္ဆိုရင္၊ ေကာ္မာ (Comma) ေလးေတြ ခံေပးရပါတယ္။ --simpler, inferior, or wrong in any way.--- ျဖစ္ရပါမယ္။ ဒီအတုိင္းပဲ --
Americanisms, American usage, and American pronunciations --နဲ ့--- political, economic, and social powers of the US.---ျဖစ္မွာေပါ့။ Americanism မွာ အမ်ားနာမ္ 's' ထည့့္စရာမလိုသလို American usage မွာ 's' ထည့္မွ ေနာက္ကလိုက္လာတဲ့ American pronunciations နဲ ့ သဒၵါအားျဖင့္ တြဲဘက္ညီမွာပါ။ ... that he and those who supports that vision-- မွာက်ေတာ့ 'he' တခုတည္းဆိုရင္ 'Simple present' ျဖစ္တဲ့ 'supports 'ကိုသံုးရင္ မမွားပါဘူး။ ဒါေပမယ့္ 'he and those who' လို ့ အမ်ား
နဲ ့ျဖစ္လာေတာ့ 'support' ကိုပဲ သံုးရပါမယ္။
-- that united states (is) willing to matches action with action.-- မွာ 'United States' လို ့ စာလံုးၾကီးနဲ ့ေရးရမွာကို မိတ္ေဆြသိၿပီးသား ျဖစ္ပါလိမ့္မယ္။ 'to' ရဲ့ေနာက္မွာ
'Verb 1' လို ့ေခၚတဲ့ 'match' ပဲ လိုက္ရမယ္။ 'matches' လုပ္လို ့မရဘူး။ ေသေသခ်ာခ်ာ ျပန္နားေထာင္ၾကည့္ပါ။
'actions with actions' လို ့ ၾကားရပါ့မယ္။ 'action with action' ဆိုရင္လည္း သေဘာတရားအရ မမွားပါဘူး။ 'elmination' ရဲ့ စာလံုးေပါင္းလည္း မွားေနပါတယ္။ 'Elimination' ပါ။ စာရုိက္မွားတာလို ့ ေခ်ပႏုိင္ေပမယ့္၊ အျခားသူတဦးကို တုိက္ခိုက္ၿပီးမွ တင္တာျဖစ္လို ့၊ အမွားစစ္ၿပီးမွ တင္သင့္ပါတယ္။
---We welcome positive constructive relations --
မွာလည္း နာမ၀ိေသသနေတြ ထပ္ထားတာျဖစ္
လို ့ 'positive, constructive' လို ့ ျဖစ္သင့္ပါတယ္။ ေသခ်ာေအာင္ ၀ါရွင္တန္ပို ့စ္ကို ဖြင့္ၾကည့္လိုက္ပါတယ္။ သတင္းေပးပို ့သူက ေအပီသတင္းဌာနမွာလုပ္ေနတဲ့ ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံသူပါ။ သူလည္း ေကာ္မာကို သံုးထားတာ မေတြ ့ရပါဘူး။ ေကာ္မာစည္းကမ္းအရ သံုးထားတဲ့ နာမ၀ိေသသနေတြဟာ၊ သီးျခားအဓိပၸါယ္ကိုယ္စီရွိၾကမယ္ဆိုရင္၊ ေကာ္မာခံရပါတယ္။ မရွိဘူးဆုိရင္ ခံစရာမလုိပါဘူး။
နည္းနည္းထပ္ရွာၾကည့္လိုက္တာ ၊သတင္းစာေတြထဲမွာေတာ့ ခၽြင္းခ်က္ေလးေတြ ရွိႏုိင္တယ္လို ့ သိရပါတယ္။ ေနာက္ဆံုးအပိုဒ္မွာေတာ့ သိပ္ၿပီး ဒြိဟျဖစ္စရာမရွိပါဘူး။ 'We think that is in' ေရာ၊ 'We think that in' ေရာ အဓိပၸါယ္ ကြာျခားမွု မရွိပါဘူး။ ဒုတိယစကားက မွားသလိုလုိ ျဖစ္ေနေပမယ္၊့
အမွန္ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။ တရုတ္ျပည္က ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံအေပၚ၊ အေကာင္းဘက္က အျပဳသေဘာေဆာင္ ဆက္ဆံတာဟာ၊ သူ ့ႏုိင္ငံအတြက္ေရာ၊
သူ ့ရဲ့အိမ္နီးခ်င္းအတြက္ပါ ေကာင္းတယ္လို ့ ေျပာတာခ်ည္းပဲ ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။ သူ ့ခင္ပြန္း သမတေဟာင္း ကလင္တန္ရ့ဲ အဂၤလိပ္လို မိတ္ခြန္းေတြ သိပ္ေကာင္းလို ့၊ တရုတ္ျပည္က တကၠသိုလ္ေတြမွာ ျပန္ၿပီး ပို ့ခ်ေပးေနရတယ္လို ့ မွတ္သားဖူးပါတယ္။
စာလည္း နည္းနည္းရွည္သြားၿပီ။ အျပဳသေဘာေဆာင္တဲ့ ေ၀ဖန္အၾကံျပဳခ်က္ေတြကို၊ ေစာင့္ေမွ်ာ္ေနပါ့မယ္။ ေက်းဇူးတင္ပါတယ္။
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
တပတ္အတြင္း အဖတ္အမ်ားဆံုး
-
ဒါဟာ ရခုိင္တုိင္းရင္းသားေတြရဲ႕ ရုိးရာအလွတရားကုိ ကမၻာ့စင္ျမင့္ထက္မွာ ပထမဆုံးအေနနဲ႔ ကုိယ္စားျပဳေဖာ္ထုတ္ျပမွာ လည္း ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။ ဆက္လက္ဖတ္ရ... -
ပိုက္ဆံကိုေမ့လိုက္ပါေတာ့၊ ဘစ္ကိြဳင္(Bitcoin) နည္းပညာဟာ ေတာ္လွန္ေရးတစ္ရပ္ပါ bitcoin (ဓာတ္ပုံ - google) -
ဇန္နဝါရီလ ၂၈ ရက္ေန႔က ဒါးဗို႔စ္မွာ က်င္းပတဲ့ ကမာၻ႔စီးပြားေရး ဖိုရမ္မွာ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ ေပးပို႔တဲ့ ႐ုပ္သံဖိုင္ကို ဖြင့္ေနစဥ္။ (ဓာတ္ပံု - G... -
ေကာ့မွဴးကုိ စိတ္ခ်မ္းသာေအာင္ထားဖုိ႔ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ရဲ႕ ျပဳိင္ဘက္ေဟာင္း တုိက္တြန္း မုိးမခအေထာက္ေတာ္ အမွတ္ ဝဝ၇ ဧျပီ ၃၊ ၂ဝ၁၂ ေကာ့မွဴးျမိဳ႕ေဒ... -
~ "ျပိဳင္ကား နဲ႔အတူ လန္းေနတဲ့ မိုးေဟကို" http://model.myanmarcelebrity.com/2011/12/myanmar-leading-model-moe-hay-kos-sexy.ht...
မစ္ကလင္တန္ေျပာသြားတာေလးလိုက္ေရးၾကည့္တာပါ။မွားတာေလးေတြ ့ရင္ျပင္ေပးၾကပါခင္ဗ်ား။("I made it clear...that he and those who supports that vision which she layout for me.. both inside and outside of goverment will have our supports as they continuous to make progress and that united state,its willing to matches action with action.We're not at the point yet that we can consider lifting sanctions that we have in place because of our ongoing concerns about policies that have to be reversed But any steps that the government takes will be carefully considered and will be as i said matched because we want to see political and economic reform take whole.and i told leader ship that we will certainly consider the easing and the eliminataion of sanction as we go forward in this process together
We welcome positive constructive relations between China and her neighbors.We think that is in China's interest as well as in the neighborhood's interest"